Why don’t African governments invest more in infrastructure?

Brian Klass has shared some interesting speculation on this question at Good Governance Africa.  He makes several good points, but I don’t think this is the whole story.  From his article:

Only 16% of roads in sub-Saharan Africa are paved—the world’s lowest rate by a wide margin (58% of South Asia’s roads are paved), according to the World Bank.

African governments have not built needed roads or maintained existing ones. This sluggishness runs against strong evidence that financing infrastructure is a valuable long-term investment that creates almost immediate payoffs. Every $1 of public infrastructure spending can contribute up to $0.25 in annual GDP, according to a 2012 World Economic Forum study. This means that savvy investments can pay for themselves in as little as four years.

So why do African governments neglect infrastructure while claiming to search for ways to lift their economies? Two major reasons: constituencies and a penchant for grand projects.

First, “development funding is driven by constituencies,” explained Todd Moss, a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development, a Washington, DC-based think-tank, in a 2013 report on donor aid efficacy. “There’s a strong constituency for health and education funding but there’s no constituency for infrastructure.” It is hard to imagine a TV ad in the US asking for money to pave a road in rural Mozambique the same way it might plead for funds to sponsor a sick child in Somalia. Similarly, when a road is built, statistics cannot back up its impact the way that a public health NGO might showcase the number of vaccinations it has provided. …

Second, government investment in infrastructure—and foreign donor support—is disproportionately skewed towards “big ticket” items rather than smaller projects and ongoing maintenance. Whether it is an African government or a donor-led aid programme, both entities benefit more from grabbing headlines by funding a massive new dam than upgrading a network of roads lost in the hinterland.

While I’m sure both of these things contribute to underinvestment in infrastructure, this can’t possibly explain all of it.  One point here is that there should be an obvious domestic constituency pushing for better roads – business owners.  Even if most businesses are state-owned, no enterprise benefits from high shipping costs and late deliveries, so you don’t need an independent middle class of small business owners for this prediction to work.

The other point is that construction is a great tool for patronage.  Most countries produce the materials that go into roads (cement, gravel, etc.) domestically, since they’re bulky and low-value.  Setting up a political ally with a cement firm and a paving contract seems like a really defensible way of promoting local industry and improving infrastructure while also reinforcing one’s patronage network.  I can’t find the citation now, but I’ve heard that Japan has proportionately more roads than other countries because construction contracts are such a mainstay of patronage there.

What else do you think might lead to underinvestment in infrastructure?

8 thoughts on “Why don’t African governments invest more in infrastructure?

  1. A suggestion in terms of (very simplistic?) game theory: Building and maintaining a road typically requires coordination between different political entities. Profits might not be distributed equally, e.g. in case of traffic passing through a district without increasing local revenue.

    If you feel that a road would be useful but cannot be sure about your neighbors, it makes little sense to start building a chunk just on your own. So you spend money on a structure with immediate local benefits/visibility instead of betting on something that you only partially control. I think this logic could be applicable both for leaders caring about the public good and for those who only want to cater to their clientèle.

    PS. Acemoglu/Robinson (Why Nations Fail) also have at least one section on the politics of infrastructure. Can’t remember the details right now.


  2. How are You ? I a m deeply interested in your different works. I look forward to hearing from you Yours Christian Bitelain Bukavu/DRCtel : +243998676616

    De : Rachel Strohm À : bitelachristian@yahoo.fr Envoyé le : Jeudi 9 avril 2015 16h18 Objet : [New post] Why don’t African governments invest more in infrastructure? #yiv2204610061 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv2204610061 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv2204610061 a.yiv2204610061primaryactionlink:link, #yiv2204610061 a.yiv2204610061primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv2204610061 a.yiv2204610061primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv2204610061 a.yiv2204610061primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv2204610061 WordPress.com | Rachel Strohm posted: “Brian Klass has shared some interesting speculation on this question at Good Governance Africa.  He makes several good points, but I don’t think this is the whole story.  From his article:Only 16% of roads in sub-Saharan Africa are paved—the world’s low” | |


  3. You’re dead on about Japan. I also think infrastructure, for instance the paving and maintaining of said paved roads, is a lot harder and more expensive then folks realize. All they have to do is drive down any road in America and notice the gouged surface. So a lot of local governments are turning roads into toll roads and letting private companies figure it out. And other than state-run Chinese companies, I’m not sure how many companies would be willing to take on such a project in Africa. Especially because apparently, a lot of companies that have done this even in America, are consistently losing money.


    1. Hmm, do you have a source for the thing about Japanese infrastructure? I can’t remember where I read that, and Google isn’t helping.

      It’s a good point as well about the cost of maintaining high quality roads. I wonder how it compares to the cost of maintaining other infrastructure, like school buildings and clinics.


      1. Here is a good summary:

        Or as The Economist simply put it back in 2008:
        “Japanese governments have long used the petrol levy and other tax revenues to splash out on road-building, in a form of patronage politics that has helped the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) to hold on to power while smothering a once gorgeous country in concrete.”

        Lots of parallels to Africa in terms of essentially LDP one-party rule; ties between regulators, bureaucrats, and business; lots of money changing hands; etc.

        It’s been going on for a long time. All the way back in 1960, Akira Kurosawa did his great but dark flick “The Bad Sleep Well” about a construction company.


Comments are closed.