Here’s the latest edition of my Africa Update newsletter. We’ve got Mali’s 35-year old foreign minister, the dodgeball association of South Sudan, accountability for Mozambican mayors over gay rights, the future of nuclear power on the continent, and more.
West Africa: Ghana’s plan to build a new national cathedral is coming in for heavy criticism. Also in Ghana, cocoa companies are working with local chiefs to improve property rights for cocoa farmers. The Nigerian government is allegedly forcing internally displaced people to return to their dangerous home regions so that they can vote in upcoming primary elections. Félicitations à Kamissa Camara, qui est devenue chef de la diplomatie malienne agée de 35 ans. In Niger, farmers are using a nitrogen-fixing tree to improve their soil quality and fight climate change. Here’s a good background article on current politics in Togo. The latest edition of West Africa Insights is all about urbanization in the region.
Central Africa: Read all about the DRC’s upcoming election, including its unusual single-round voting that can allow a president to be elected with a tiny minority of votes, and Kabila’s preferred candidate for the presidency. Désarmement dans le Pool : le pasteur Ntumi fait « un pas dans la bonne direction », selon Brazzaville. This article situates Uganda’s social media tax in a long history of unfair colonial taxation. Museveni has threatened to abolish the Ugandan Parliament after protests over the beating of prominent opposition MP Bobi Wine, whose popularity clearly alarms him. Listen to this piece about poor conditions on Uganda’s prison farms. Tanzania is cutting off markets in refugee camps in an apparent attempt to force Burundian refugees to return home. Rwanda is trying to boost tax revenue by simplifying its tax code at the same time it raises tax rates.
East Africa: Tanzania wants to make it illegal to question government statistics. If you’d like to approach the government with a non-statistical matter, definitely read these insider tips on how policymaking works in Tanzania. South Sudan’s newest athletic league is a dodgeball association for teenage girls. Read this insightful article about how John Garang’s death led to the fracturing of the SPLM. Don’t miss this recent report from the Kenya Human Rights Commission about the country’s high rates of extrajudicial killings. This article suggests that the Kenyan security forces routinely ignore tips about planned mass shootings, and that perpetrators are rarely arrested. More than 90% of Somalia’s new cabinet ministers are said to hold MA or PhD degrees, but only 8% are women.
Southern Africa: At some South African universities, nearly 80% of black students report that they sometimes don’t have enough to eat. A South African court has ruled that marriages between Muslim couples in the country must be legally registered and not simply recorded with religious authorities, giving women legal protection in the event of divorce. Zimbabwe’s harsh laws criminalizing the transmission of HIV are discouraging people from coming for testing and treatment.
Public Health: I’m excited to hear about sensors.AFRICA, which is using low cost monitors to track air quality in several countries across the continent. A non-profit organization is offering cash transfers to women who bring their children in for vaccinations in Nigeria. One Nigerian woman has created a mental health hotline after struggling to access treatment for depression.
Economics: This was a really interesting thread about how legal uncertainty is increasing fuel prices in Kenya — an exemption on VAT for fuel expired on August 31 with no legal guidance on whether it was meant to be extended, leading to strikes by fuel importers. South Sudan is beginning to bring oilfields back online after production was drastically reduced by the civil war. An economist discusses how the cedi’s depreciation lead to the recent collapse of several banks in Ghana. This was an interesting piece on the history of Ghana’s failed attempts to create a local rubber processing industry. A new book argues that political conflict determines when protests take place in Africa, but economics determines who participates in them. Is there a future for civilian nuclear energy in Africa?
China in Africa: This article shared some interesting reflections on the shortcomings of standard “China in Africa” narratives. Chinese handset maker Transsion is capturing the African market with affordable phones that feature built-in radio reception and cameras calibrated for darker skin.
Arts and Literature: Check out Robtel Neajai Pailey’s interactive website for her anti-corruption children’s books about Liberia, and Lupita Nyong’o’s upcoming children’s book as well! Apply to work with the British Library on their collection of African-language materials. Lots of interesting articles to be found in the Johannesburg Review of Books. Read this dispatch from the Mogadishu Book Fair. The Goethe Institut is calling for submissions of young adult literature by African authors in English, French and Kiswahili. Here are all the African film festivals you can attend in 2018.
Conferences and Scholarships: Register for the Decolonial Transformationsconference at the University of Sussex — and before you do, read this great curriculum which a group of Cambridge students put together for decolonizing the Human, Social and Political Sciences degree. Submit a paper to the Africa Social and Behavioral Change conference in English, French, Portuguese or Kiswahili. The Working Group in African Political Economy is now accepting paper applications. You can also send your scientific papers or science journalism to the African Science Desk to have them turned into short documentaries and explainers. Spread the word about this multidisciplinary post-doc for African scholars at Stellenbosch Institute for Advanced Study.
Duncan Green recently shared a blog post with a number of insider tips on how policymaking works in Tanzania from Togolani Mavura, the Private Secretary to former president Jakaya Kikwete. The whole thing is worth reading.
Key points include the importance of understanding the structure of government:
Which pathway to follow is another catch – parliamentary, thinktank, lobbying officials or civil servants – it depends on the particular policy that you are proposing. Some policies can only be imposed on the executive by the parliament; others emanate from the civil service; for others, you just go to the political party. The National Executive Committee of the ruling party in Tanzania has policy-making powers and can direct the government to act, so get your idea into the party manifesto ahead of the elections.
Taking policymakers’ incentives into account:
If, after years of trying, the government has not bought your idea, it is probably because:
– your idea or proposal is good but not good enough compared to those submitted by others
– you have not addressed the core interest, the self-interest, the ‘nerve centre’ of the individual policy makers or core interests of the respective institution e.g. your proposal may render that particular institution irrelevant or threaten their source of revenue.
Understanding whether local pilots are feasible:
Tanzania is a unitary system, not a federal system, so any programme has to be introduced in all parts of the country. And if it goes wrong, it can boomerang and trigger an electoral backlash for the party in power.
(Hat tip for the article to Tom Wein.)
Far-right figurehead Steve Bannon has been back in the news recently for being invited to headline the New Yorker’s annual festival, and then promptly disinvited after a liberal outcry that this was giving legitimacy to his xenophobic ideas. One of the more surprising defenses of Bannon’s invitation came from writer Malcolm Gladwell, who said in a series of tweets that the festival’s audiences should be exposed to competing ideas, and that he hoped Bannon’s views would be discredited by a public debate.
Gladwell has been roundly criticized for the first tweet in particular, with people noting that he’s making an apolitical, process-oriented claim (“we should be able to discuss different ideas”) about a set of ideas which are deeply political (xenophobia and white nationalism). This discussion sets two valid points in tension with each other. I certainly think that freedom of expression is important. But it’s also true that there’s a real cost to saying that racist ideas should be discussed on the same footing as ideas about diversity and social justice. When it is appropriate to say that an idea is so bad that it shouldn’t be given a platform for debate? And how can we take a more nuanced approach than simply banning all ideas that don’t agree with our own politics?
Medical ethics has a concept that’s useful in this situation: clinical equipoise. Equipoise means that the medical community is genuinely uncertain about whether a treatment will be effective. They have reason to believe that it could help patients, and at minimum won’t harm them, but don’t yet have proof of its benefits. This is the ethical justification for conducting randomized controlled trials to determine whether the treatment works. If a researcher knew in advance that a treatment would definitely help a patient, then there would be no ethical justification for randomly withholding the treatment from the control group. Similarly, if a researcher already knew that a treatment didn’t work, or might even injure patients, there’s no ethical justification for testing it at all. RCTs are a tool to improve medical quality of care, not an excuse to test out harmful procedures for the ostensibly neutral sake of “scientific progress.”
The ethics of public debates are arguably similar to those of medical trials. Debates let people try out new concepts and see how others respond to them, and are ideally done with the goal of leaving the world a better place for having had the debate. Like clinical trials, they’re most productive when they focus on issues with a range of possible solutions, and with genuine uncertainty about which one would be best. You could pick any number of examples here: how to best reform failing schools, how to manage the opioid crisis, how to balance the gains from free trade with the harm caused to industries exposed to trade, and so forth. Debates on such topics can bring out useful arguments from various sides, and enrich the overall conversation.
Many of Bannon’s ideas fail the equipoise test because we already know with certainty that they are harmful to people, and don’t bring any commensurate benefits. Take his desire to ban all immigration to the US from majority Muslim countries. This is justified with an ostensible concern about terrorism. However, there’s data showing that right-wing groups in the US carry out significantly more acts of random public violence than Muslim groups, and that Muslim immigrants in particular virtually never participate in this type of violence. In addition, many studies have shown that immigration is on average good for economic growth in both sending and receiving countries. Banning immigration on the basis of religious or national identity is thus discriminatory, harmful to the immigrants themselves, and harmful to citizens of their countries of origin and reception. The only “benefit” of this policy is that it provides comfort to racists, which clearly should not be the goal of an ethical public policy.
Inviting Bannon to headline a prominent festival suggests that his ideas are worthy of discussion and could enrich the overall debate. It’s an unethical position to take with someone who has a clear interest in causing harm to others and no credible data on the supposed benefits of his ideas. The New Yorker made the right choice in disinviting him.
This question has presumably been around roughly as long as Coke itself, and has sparked a number of efforts for medicine distributors to piggyback on Coke’s supply chain, none with I believe much success. The issue got a fresh airing on Twitter recently from Niti Bhan. Then Prashant Yadav pointed the conversation towards a 2013 SSIR article that he and coauthors Orla Stapleton and Luk Van Wassenhove had published on this topic. The article itself is gated, but he shared the chart below on Twitter, and it’s well worth a read. As he points out, “[The issue is] mostly about information flow, incentives in the system, and regulatory impediments.”